Negotiation and conflict in English

The stages of a negotiation and their phrases, the key notions, principled negotiation, bargaining conditionals, the five Thomas-Kilmann modes and phrases for defusing tension.

  • 27 cards
  • 5 topics
  • Free

The outline, topic by topic

Each topic is weighted the way the exam weighs it.

  1. Concepts
  2. Questions
  3. Sort and link
  4. Scenarios
  5. Understand

A few cards from the deck

  • BATNA: what is it?

    Show the answer

    Best alternative to a negotiated agreement: the best course of action you can take if no deal is reached.

    It sets your real power: the better your BATNA, the less you need to accept a bad offer. Know yours before negotiating, and guess the other side's.

  • Complete the hypothetical offer: "If you extended the deadline by a week, we ___ the extra feature."

    • would deliver
    • will deliver
    • would have delivered
    • delivers
    Show the answer

    would deliver

    With "extended" (simple past) in the if-clause, the main clause takes "would" + base verb: that is the second conditional. "Will deliver" mixes the two structures.

  • Fisher and Ury's four principles: separate the people from the problem, focus on … rather than positions, invent options for mutual gain and use … criteria.

    Show the answer

    Fisher and Ury's four principles: separate the people from the problem, focus on interests rather than positions, invent options for mutual gain and use objective criteria.

    Example: two people want the same orange (position); one wants the juice, the other the peel (interests). Seeing the interests lets each side get what it really wants.

  • Bottom line: what is it?

    Show the answer

    A limit set before negotiating: the worst offer you will still accept, beyond which you turn the deal down.

    It follows from the BATNA: you do not accept a deal worse than what you would get by walking away. The BATNA is what you will do with no deal; the bottom line is the threshold of the deal itself.

  • A client writes "This is unacceptable. We were promised delivery last week." Which reply defuses the tension?

    • Actually, we never promised delivery last week, so there is no delay on our side.
    • Please calm down: the delay is the carrier's fault and we can't do anything.
    • I understand your frustration and I'm sorry. I'll check your order and reply today.
    • Thank you for your message. We will answer it in due course when the team is free.
    Show the answer

    I understand your frustration and I'm sorry. I'll check your order and reply today.

    The client first wants to be heard, then a precise action. The right reply acknowledges the emotion, apologises and commits to a dated action. Contradicting, blaming someone else or promising vaguely irritates more.