The phases of a project

The course of a project in a classic life cycle: feasibility, scoping, design, build, acceptance, deployment and closure, with each phase's purpose, deliverable and exit milestone.

  • 21 cards
  • 5 topics
  • Free

The outline, topic by topic

Each topic is weighted the way the exam weighs it.

  1. Concepts
  2. Questions
  3. Sort and link
  4. Scenarios
  5. Understand

A few cards from the deck

  • Project phase: what is it?

    Show the answer

    A period of the project devoted to one kind of activity, which produces a deliverable and ends with a validation.

    Splitting into phases lets you decide to continue, correct or stop at each phase end, before committing the next phase's money.

  • What is the closure phase for?

    • Hand over the documentation, release the team and draw lessons in a review
    • Fix the defects found by users after go-live
    • Have the sponsor validate the requirements
    • Train users on the delivered tool
    Show the answer

    Hand over the documentation, release the team and draw lessons in a review

    Closure ends the project: documents handed over, resources released, review written. Fixing defects belongs to warranty or maintenance, training to deployment.

  • The … study checks that a project is possible and worthwhile before committing to it; … then sets its objectives, scope, budget and schedule.

    Show the answer

    The feasibility study checks that a project is possible and worthwhile before committing to it; scoping then sets its objectives, scope, budget and schedule.

    Feasibility answers "should we do it?", scoping answers "what exactly do we do, with what means?".

  • Deliverable: what is it?

    Show the answer

    A tangible, verifiable result produced by a task or a phase: a document, a piece of software, a training delivered.

    Without a deliverable you cannot say work is done: "making progress on design" is not one, "the reviewed design file" is.

  • A project starts straight with development. In month three, the sponsor asks for functions nobody had costed. Which skipped phase would have prevented this drift?

    • Acceptance, which should have taken place before the build
    • The feasibility study, which compares solution scenarios
    • Design, which chooses the technical architecture
    • Scoping, which fixes objectives, scope, budget and schedule
    Show the answer

    Scoping, which fixes objectives, scope, budget and schedule

    Without a validated charter there is no reference for what is in the project. Every request becomes a negotiation, and the budget drifts. Feasibility says whether to do the project, design how to build it: neither bounds what it contains.